History[ edit ] A painting depicting the signing of the United States Constitution Eight state constitutions in effect at the time of the Constitutional Convention convened in Philadelphia included an amendment mechanism. Amendment-making power rested with the legislature in three of the states and in the other five it was given to specially elected conventions. The Articles of Confederation provided that amendments were to be proposed by Congress and ratified by the unanimous vote of all thirteen state legislatures.
Constitution was first developed at the Convention, where each state's vote was determined by the majority preference of its delegates. Two of the delegates from New York, John Lansing and Robert Yates, both strident anti-Federalists, left the convention early due to disagreement with the proceedings.
Their departure cost New York its vote for the rest of the Convention, and has been considered by some scholars to be an important event. We investigate how often New York's vote was critical to proposals passing or failing, both when present and counter-factually when absent.
Most of the 28 votes were on nominal issues. Voting at the Constitutional Convention followed the procedure of requiring state votes to be determined by the majority vote of each state's present delegates, and the outcome of the vote to be decided by majority vote of the states.
In establishing the new legislature, the adopted Constitution set rules such that a simple majority of all present representatives would determine the outcome of each legislative vote. We investigate how Convention vote outcomes might have changed if this voting rule was in place for the Convention.
Using spatial models on separate roll calls we identify which vote outcomes would have differed under individual delegate voting. Analysis suggests only 16 of the vote outcomes would have changed but those that were predicted to change included considering unequal representation in the Senate i.
Previous studies of the U. Constitutional Convention have relied on votes recorded for the state blocs or a relatively small number of delegate votes. We construct a new dataset covering delegate votes on over substantive roll calls, and use the data in several ways.
First, we estimate a single dimensional position for the delegates which reflects their overall voting patterns. Next, we explain these positions using a variety of delegate and constituent variables.
Finally, we suggest a method for identifying state and floor medians, which can be used to predict equilibrium outcomes at the Convention. Delegate level analysis of the U. Constitutional Convention has been limited because the Convention did not record delegate votes.
The CCRG dataset represents a significant improvement over previous datasets such as those compiled by McDonaldDougherty and Heckelmanand datasets based on votes recorded for state blocs Jillson Charles Beard  argued that the U.
Constitution was created to advance the interests of people who owned personalty, particularly those at the Constitutional Convention.
Because delegate votes on individual clauses at the Constitutional Convention were not publicly recorded, prior empirical analyses have been limited to inferred votes on a specific set of unrelated clauses. We extend this inquiry by inferring votes related to currency and debt issues which Beard put forth as the prime issues for those who owned personalty.
Our analysis on these votes generates little support for a narrow version of the Beard thesis, which states that all personalty groups voted in a unified coalition at the Convention and supported the Constitution.
Our analysis provides some support, however, for a broader interpretation that personalty and realty interests affected delegate voting behavior at the margin.Constitutional convention uk essay papers africa essay writing diagrammbeschreibung englisch beispiel essay british tea culture essay hook tables and graphs in research paper personal expressive essay on government essay love your environment matruprem essay writing freud three essays on the theory of sexuality online an exciting cricket.
Constitutional convention essay offenbach dessay hamlet iolaire poem analysis essays college application essay for rns planning sheet for persuasive essay argument that all animals are equal essays writing good reflective essay harvard mba research papers apa medical research paper, gw medical school secondary essays jan erik naessaye.
The Federalist Papers are a series of 85 essays arguing in support of the United States Constitution. Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay were the authors behind the pieces, and the three men wrote collectively under the name of Publius. The U.S. Constitution and Monetary Powers: An Analysis of the Constitutional Convention and Constitutional Transformation of the Nation's Monetary System Emerged Farley Grubb NBER Working Paper No.
There is no official record of the proceedings regarding the Constitutional Convention of James Madison kept the journal of the proceedings, but it included only procedural information Use ProQuest Congressional to research constitutional amendments for legislative history. The Constitution of the United States, written in , by James Madison, with the help of members of the Constitutional Convention, in Philadelphia, was the result of .