While the US presidential election surprised many people, there is one person, if he were still alive, who would not blink an eye that Trump—the corporate magnate—won. Economist Karl Polanyi — studied the evolution of capitalism. His book The Great Transformation argued that the market and the state business and government increasingly work together to advance their mutual self-interest, often at the expense of the people. Examples include legal enforcement of contracts, private property rights, and labor policies to influence wages.
Women of Color Against Violence. In its introduction chapter, the book explains how non-profits have evolved into organizations that divert political movements into […] As soon as we begun organizing our workplace into a union—a drug and alcohol rehab center—the murky non-profit world proved to be an obstacle.
In its introduction chapter, the book explains how non-profits have evolved into organizations that divert political movements into dead ends, shape public opinion, and most relevant to this article, perform services previously done by the state.
The rise of the private non-profit service sector is not a historic accident, but correlates perfectly with the downfall of state-run social services. Nor is the destruction of the state sector accidental, but a necessary phase that showcases the sickness of our economic system, capitalism.
Regan and his English counterpart, Margaret Thatcher, were the ones—fully endorsed by the capitalist class—to first implement the measures that have, to this day, cleared the way for the private sector to further encroach on public terrain. But even this must be viewed in a larger historical context.
The state sector ballooned after WWII and began to shrink after about While the post war economy allowed for the funding of social services, it was the working-class who demanded it.
Indeed, most of the social services that any country offers is either directly or indirectly the results of the revolutionary-minded upsurges of the post WWII era.
This explains the constant attacks on the public sector in EVERY capitalist country, with the attacks becoming more vicious and desperate with each passing day. State sectors are the targets because they are some of the last places on earth that private investment has yet to be allowed.
International investors have already intruded upon every other nook and cranny of the globe, hitting a ceiling in the process. Intimately bound with the process of privatization is the non-profit social service sector, which sprang into existence out of necessity in the eighties after state-run institutions were shut-down.
In effect, state institutions were outsourced to those who promised to do the same job for a fraction of the price; sometimes the job was not to be done at all. The people who were once provided services were either forced onto the street, cared for by non-profits on shoe-string budgets, or private entities that cared little about service.
The result was a complex continuum of service providers that ranged from private non-profit to explicitly private for-profit. Another important reason why the state sector was targeted for privatization was it strong union density. In the private sector the percentage of unionized workers has declined drastically— thanks to abhorrent anti-union legislation— while remaining strong wherever there was state ran institutions.
Because of their shared identity as state workers and the usually centralized organizational structure of state institutions, the ability to organize in the public domain is much easier. The planned decentralization that resulted made forming unions much more difficult sinceemployment in highly unionized state hospitals has fallen byIt must be understood that organized workers are always a threat to big business: The ongoing privatizing process has had a direct, negative effect on the ability to organize a higher percentage of the public sector into unions, a trend that is seriously challenging the already poor health of the countries unions, while driving the wages of workers down everywhere.
The result has not been pretty. Non-profit service providers have a ready-made ideology to offer their workers who demand higher pay: The paradox here is that non-profits function mainly off state funding; the same funding that pays unionized state workers much more.
And while the average non-profit service worker makes very little indeed, the bosses make out quite nicely. The non-profit management structure is based on the corporate model, and with this model comes a classical belief system:As soon as we began to organize our workplace into a union, a non-profit drug and alcohol rehabilitation facility, the murky world of non-profits proved to be an obstacle.
Capitalism Needs More Non-Profits by Joe Carter Last month I stirred up a bit of ill will by poking fun at advocates of distributism (see: We need more non-profit organizations, more churches, and more people going in to ministry and non-profit work in general.
We can afford it. Non-Profit Capitalism Essay Sample. 1. Executive Summary. This report defines, examines and promotes a non-profit capitalistic business model. The model endorses enterprises which compete in the free market, but eschews profits in favor of social benefits.
If such entanglement between the state and market benefited all equally, this would be a non-issue. However, Polanyi claimed the effects of this transformation come at the expense of the majority of the population.
As capitalism expanded, it increasingly benefited those who already had resources, often at the expense of those who didn’t. On the other hand, Polanyi observed that capitalism generated the need for a welfare state because it increasingly created social problems as it expanded production.
The need for welfare protections led to the development of social forces (unions, etc.)—and indeed the nonprofit sector itself—as a way to generate those social protections.
54 Capitalism and Profit The surplus generated by capitalist firms within the US economy is about $1,,,, per year.2 This is a vast sum. PROFIT In capitalism the surplus is labeled as “profit.”.