Write essays that reflect who you are; use specific concrete details and write in a natural style. Begin work on these essays early, and feel free to ask your friends and mentors to provide constructive feedback. Ask if the essay's tone sounds like your voice. If those closest to you do not think your essay captures who you are, we will not be able to recognize what is distinctive about you.
Conclusion Introduction Global computer-based communications cut across territorial borders, creating a new realm of human activity and undermining the feasibility--and legitimacy--of applying laws based on geographic boundaries.
While these electronic communications play havoc with geographic boundaries, a new boundary, made up of the screens and passwords that separate the virtual world from the "real world" of atoms, emerges. This new boundary defines a distinct Cyberspace that needs and can create new law and legal institutions of its own.
Territorially-based law-making and law-enforcing authorities find this new environment deeply threatening. But established territorial authorities may yet learn to defer to the self-regulatory efforts of Cyberspace participants who care most deeply about this new digital trade Stanford law school application personal statement ideas, information, and services.
Separated from doctrine tied to territorial jurisdictions, new rules will emerge, in a variety of online spaces, to govern a wide range of new phenomena that have no clear parallel in the nonvirtual world.
These new rules will play the role of law by defining legal personhood and property, resolving disputes, and crystallizing a collective conversation about core values.
Breaking Down Territorial Borders A. Territorial Borders in the "Real World" We take for granted a world in which geographical borders--lines separating physical spaces--are of primary importance in determining legal rights and responsibilities: There has until now been a general correspondence between borders drawn in physical space between nation states or other political entities and borders in "law space.
The Trademark Example Consider a specific example to which we will refer throughout this article: Trademark law is distinctly based on geographical separations. Different countries have different trademark laws, with important differences on matters as central as whether the same name can be used in different lines of business.
In the United States, the same name can even be used for the same line of business if there is sufficient geographic separation of use to avoid confusion. The physical cues provided by different lines of business allow most marks to be used in multiple lines of commerce without dilution of the other users' rights.
A trademark owner must therefore also be constantly alert to territorially-based claims of abandonment, and to dilution arising from uses of confusingly similar marks, and must master the different procedural and jurisdictional laws of various countries that apply in each such instance.
Although they may be based on historical accident, geographic borders for law make sense in the real world. Their relationship to the development and enforcement of legal rules is logically based on a number of related considerations.
Control over physical space, and the people and things located in that space, is a defining attribute of sovereignty and statehood. For example, the U. Such an assertion of control would conflict with the Brazilian government's recognized monopoly on the use of force over its citizens.
The correspondence between physical boundaries and boundaries in "law space" also reflects a deeply rooted relationship between physical proximity and the effects of any particular behavior. That is, Brazilian trademark law governs the use of marks in Brazil because that use has a more direct impact on persons and assets located within that geographic territory than anywhere else.
For example, the existence of a large sign over "Jones' Restaurant" in Rio de Janeiro is unlikely to have an impact on the operation of "Jones' Restaurant" in Oslo, Norway, for we may assume that there is no substantial overlap between the customers, or competitors, of these two entities. Protection of the former's trademark does not--and probably should not--affect the protection afforded the latter's.
We generally accept the notion that the persons within a geographically defined border are the ultimate source of law-making authority for activities within that border.
Many, or perhaps most, law schools in the United States grade on a caninariojana.com process generally works within each class, where the instructor grades each exam, and then ranks the exams against each other, adding to and subtracting from the initial grades so that the overall grade distribution matches the school's specified curve (usually a bell curve). Meet with the Stanford Pre-law advisor for an overview of the application process, to ensure that you know about resources for Stanford applicants to law school, . Introduction Global computer-based communications cut across territorial borders, creating a new realm of human activity and undermining the feasibility--and legitimacy- .
By virtue of the preceding considerations, the category of persons subject to a sovereign's laws, and most deeply affected by those laws, will consist primarily of individuals who are located in particular physical spaces.
Similarly, allocation of responsibility among levels of government proceeds on the assumption that, for many legal problems, physical proximity between the responsible authority and those most directly affected by the law will improve the quality of decision making, and that it is easier to determine the will of those individuals in physical proximity to one another.
Physical boundaries are also appropriate for the delineation of "law space" in the physical world because they can give notice that the rules change when the boundaries are crossed.
Proper boundaries have signposts that provide warning that we will be required, after crossing, to abide by different rules, and physical boundaries -- lines on the geographical map -- are generally well-equipped to serve this signpost function. The Absence of Territorial Borders in Cyberspace Cyberspace radically undermines the relationship between legally significant online phenomena and physical location.
The rise of the global computer network is destroying the link between geographical location and: The Net thus radically subverts a system of rule-making based on borders between physical spaces, at least with respect to the claim that cyberspace should naturally be governed by territorially defined rules.
Cyberspace has no territorially-based boundaries, because the cost and speed of message transmission on the Net is almost entirely independent of physical location: Messages can be transmitted from any physical location to any other location without degradation, decay, or substantial delay, and without any physical cues or barriers that might otherwise keep certain geographically remote places and people separate from one another.
Location remains vitally important, but only location within a virtual space consisting of the "addresses" of the machines between which messages and information are routed. The system is indifferent to the physical location of those machines, and there is no necessary connection between an Internet address and a physical jurisdiction.
Although a domain name, when initially assigned to a given machine, may be associated with a particular Internet Protocol address corresponding to the territory within which the machine is physically located e.
Or, alternatively, the owner of the domain name might request that the name become associated with an entirely different machine, in a different physical location. Physical borders no longer can function as signposts informing individuals of the obligations assumed by entering into a new, legally significant, place, because individuals are unaware of the existence of those borders as they move through virtual space.
The power to control activity in Cyberspace has only the most tenuous connections to physical location.Personal Statement Examples - Sample Law School Personal Statements. It requires a lot of effort and thought to write a personal statement that effectively captures your greatest qualities and stands out to admissions committees.
Meet with the Stanford Pre-law advisor for an overview of the application process, to ensure that you know about resources for Stanford applicants to law school, and for answers to . The personal statement request is located in the Stanford Questions section of the Transfer Common Application.
The question reads: Please provide a statement that addresses your reasons for transferring and the objectives you hope to achieve. Common Application Personal Statement The personal statement request is located in the Stanford Questions section of the Transfer Common Application.
The question reads: Please provide a statement that addresses your reasons for transferring and the objectives you hope to achieve. Regent University School of Law opened its doors in Today, the school offers a Juris Doctor (JD) in three-year and part-time formats, an online M.A.
in Law, an on-campus LL.M. in Human Rights and an on-campus and online LL.M. in American Legal caninariojana.comonally, thousands of Regent Law alumni practice law across the United States and in more than 20 countries.
Law School Personal Statements Advice There is no other component of your application that you can control as much as your law school personal statement. An excellent personal statement will separate you from the sea of candidates with similar academic qualifications.