The thoughts of david hume and fritjop capra on god

Is it possible that in our search for some basic reality, we humans may discover that although religion and science have always seemed to be in different places, the conclusion they will ultimately reach will be the same thing?

The thoughts of david hume and fritjop capra on god

David Hume was a Scottish empiricist philosopher who was an atheist in all but name. In the Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion, there are three characters who discuss the philosophy of religion: Cleanthes, Demea and Philo. A typical speech of Cleanthes runs: Since, therefore, the effects resemble each other, we are led to infer, by all the rules of analogy, that the causes also resemble; and that the Author of Nature is somewhat similar to the mind of man, though possessed of much larger faculties, proportioned to the grandeur of the work which he has executed.

Demea disagrees, thinking that is blasphemous to suggest that man could engage with the mind of God in this way. This world, for aught he knows, is very faulty and imperfect, compared to a superior standard; and was only the first rude essay of some infant deity, who afterwards abandoned it, ashamed of his lame performance: From the moment the attributes of the Deity are supposed finite, all these have place.

And I cannot, for my part, think, that so wild and unsettled a system of theology is, in any respect, preferable to none at all.

Science and Religion - Essay

While we are uncertain, whether there is one deity or many; whether the deity or deities, to whom we owe our existence, be perfect or imperfect, subordinate or supreme, dead or alive; what trust or confidence can we repose in them? What devotion or worship address to them? What veneration or obedience pay them?

To all the purposes of life, the theory of religion becomes altogether useless: This principle, having been laid down, the first question, we are entitled to ask will be: Why is there something rather than nothing? Further, supposing that things must exist, it must be possible to give a reason why they must exist just as they do and not otherwise.

For since matter is in itself indifferent to motion or to rest, and to one motion rather than another, it cannot itself contain the reason of motion, still less of a particular motion.

And although the present motion which is in matter arises from the one before it, and this in turn from the one before that, we are no further on however far we go; for the same question always remains.

Thus, the sufficient reason, which needs no further reason, must be outside the series of contingent things, and must lie in a substance which is the cause of the series, or, which is a being that bears the reason of its existence within itself; otherwise we should still not have a sufficient reason, with which we could stop.

And this final reason of things is called God. But it is evident that this can never happen, while our faculties remain the same as at present.

And no reason can be assigned, why these qualities may not belong to matter. As they are altogether unknown and inconceivable, they can never be proved incompatible with it.

What an immense profusion of beings, animated and organized, sensible and active! You admire this prodigious variety and fecundity. But inspect a little more narrowly these living existences, the only beings worth regarding.

How hostile and destructive to each other! How insufficient all of them for their own happiness! How contemptible or odious to the spectator! The whole presents nothing but the idea of a blind Nature, impregnated by a great vivifying principle, and pouring forth from her lap, without discernment or parental care, her maimed and abortive children!

Fear, anxiety, terror, agitate the weak and infirm.Coursework Service Southwest case study essays; Creative writing courses in spanish; Employee motivation and organizations during restructuring. According to David Hume, God is not different from the order that exists in the universe1.

The thoughts of david hume and fritjop capra on god

Training our thoughts along this line, one might doubt the commonly held view that Science and Religion are entirely different and exist at the opposite ends of a spectrum.4/4(1). David Hume’s various writings concerning problems of religion are among the most important and influential contributions on this topic.

In these writings Hume advances a systematic, sceptical critique of the philosophical foundations of . A summary of Part XII in David Hume's Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion.

David Hume Quotes (Author of An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding)

Learn exactly what happened in this chapter, scene, or section of Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion and what it means. Perfect for acing essays, tests, and quizzes, as well as for writing lesson plans. Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews is an electronic, peer-reviewed journal that publishes timely reviews of scholarly philosophy books.

God and the Reach of Reason: C.S. Lewis, David Hume, and Bertrand Russell // Reviews // Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews // University of Notre Dame. Dec 29,  · Sunday, December 29, Are Religion and Science One?

Good College Admission Essay Examples: Are Religion and Science One?